There are many many things we can do with technology, but it's always wise to think twice before starting something new with technology. It's one thing to just change the way you do something to be more effective or efficient. It's another thing to take on a whole new project or start doing things you have never done before.
A perfect, and fairly scary, example is the mess at the Lower Merion School District. If you are not aware of what the issue there is, the short story is that the school issued laptops with anti-theft software on it. The problem is that the software can do more than locate the computer via GPS or the IP it's logging onto the internet with. It can remotely activate the webcam and take pictures of whoever is in range of the camera, regardless of whether they are using the computer. And, they "forgot" to tell students or parents.
This much is clear and undisputed by the school.
It's turned into a bit of a nightmare for the school, since not only have they been sued by a family, but the FBI is now involved (see http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61L5R520100222.) The parents claim that that an Assistant Principal called their son into his office and accused him of serious misconduct at home. (Apparently he claimed that the boy had been taking and selling drugs. The boy says he was eating candy, not pills.) The AP then allegedly pulled out a photo taken by the webcam as proof that the accusation was accurate. The school denies that this ever happened. But, lots of folks are asking how the parents knew about this program that the school admits it didn't tell the student body about, if this did not happen? The FBI seems to be among them. And, since the people potentially being photographed are minors who tend to have their laptops in their bedrooms, you can see why the next step would be an investigation.
Now, at this point, we only know three things for a fact. 1. The school deployed this technology, which has a huge potential for abuse and legal problems, without informing the affected students or their parents. 2. The school has been sued and has retained counsel to fight the suite. 3. The FBI is investigating.
Of course, if they actually abused the system by actually spying on teenagers in their homes and even bedrooms, then the answer to "should they have done it" is obvious. But, what if they didn't abuse the technology? What if had really only been deployed for the purposes claimed, and that it had never been used for any other purpose? Should they have done it?
I suspect that no on thought to ask that question before deploying the technology. It seems to me that someone decided that it would be a really good idea to use this technology to do something they had never been able to do before and that no one considered the question "Why not?" Maybe someone brought it up and was ignored or maybe no one even brought it up. In any case, I simply cannot believe that if anyone had seriously thought about "why not" they would have failed to realize that they ran the risk of exactly this happening.
The best outcome I can see for the school at this point is lots of very bad publicity, serious disruption in school, a serious loss of respect and trust by the student and parent body, and some fairly big expenses. And, all this if they really never misused the cameras. It's not a very enticing scenario. And, it should have been foreseen.
I also can't help thinking that if someone in a decision-making capacity had thought about the ethical aspects of this decision, this would never have happened. Someone should have realized that even in the unlikely event that they could get away with this, they should not. It's simply wrong.
The bottom line is that when you want to start a new project, think about the real benefit. And think about whether you really should do it. Think about the ethical ramifications. And then think about the issues that might come up if you get found out or things go wrong. If you do that, you are likely to only implement projects that you should do, not just that you can.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


0 comments:
Post a Comment